
Why would a young man commit over 200 heists, stealing artworks and stuffing them into his attic bedroom? Finkel investigates the true story of Stéphane Breitwieser who stole nearly $2 billion worth of art—paintings, sculpture, tapestries, etc.—mostly from small museums that couldn’t afford a lot of security. Unlike other art thieves, he didn’t do it for the money. He claimed he did it to surround himself with beauty.
The first pieces he carefully displayed in his bedroom in the attic of his mother’s home in the French city of Mulhouse, but he couldn’t stop stealing and his loot began to pile up, as in any other hoarder’s lair. Breitwieser had no friends and didn’t work, but he did have a girlfriend who helped him pull off his heists.
Finkel’s earlier nonfiction book The Stranger in the Woods, about Chris Knight who spent 27 years living alone in a tent in the Maine woods, surprised me. Though curious to know a little more about Wright, I thought the story wouldn’t be substantial enough to fill a book—a feature article in a magazine, sure, but not a book. I was wrong. The depth of Finkel’s research, including in-person interviews with Knight and forays into the lives of the solitaries, kept me reading. I couldn’t help but catch his fascination with and curiosity about his subject.
Similarly here, Finkel keeps up the suspense to the last page. My book club all expressed their surprise at how spellbound they were by Finkel’s in-depth character study and by the artworks themselves.
We do have artists among us and all of us appreciate art. We’ve visited museums large and small, recognising sadly how scanty the security measures often are at the latter. How could they afford more? I remember many a small museum in Europe where, after paying a small fee at the door, I was free to wander about, no guards in the rooms and few other patrons.
We were also compelled by curiosity about Breitwieser himself. What kind of person would commit such selfish crimes? Not only did he endanger the art by taking it out of its controlled environment, but he hid it where only he and his girlfriend could enjoy it, denying the rest of us access. We were also interested in the two women who enabled him, the girlfriend who actively assisted him and his mother who pretended not to see what he was taking upstairs.
We called on the experts on law and psychology among us and speculated about his pathology. We all thought him such a strange person to act this way. But when we considered all the people these days who are greedily grabbing whatever attention, power, and money that they can, without the least regard for other people’s feelings, much less our lives and well-being—well, he’s not so strange after all.
Also, while we deplored the thefts, we did feel a twinge of sympathy. A funny thing happened near the end of our discussion. One person admitted that every time they visit a museum she and her partner played a game of identifying which piece they wished they could take home with them. Several of us admitted to doing the same; I added that I usually tried to find a postcard of my chosen piece in the museum gift shop. We had a good laugh about how narrow the line is between our art appreciation and Breitwieser’s thefts. Yet it is a line none of us would ever consider crossing.
And therein lies the value of stories such as this. We’re not so different as we might think. Yet that difference is an important one.
What true crime story have you read that surprised you?








